Classical Mode: help needed!

[d.c.palmer]

Another way Innuos might approach this would be to mirror an existing source, such as the MusicBrainz Classical Style Guide, which provides clear documentation, guidance, and examples on implementation.

The problem with this is that many of us edit our music, moving tracks around in order to free them from the artificial strictures of traditional "Albums" (recordings) and discs. In fact, this is one of the great benefits of digital storage, allowing us to liberate our music from whatever "original state" the record companies chose (often for marketing purposes).

I happen to own quite a few "duplicate" copies of recordings: generally a newer remastering vs the original recording. Many of these "duplicates" differ in their track assignments, with the reissues having far more tracks than the originals (my classic example is Charles Dutoit's magnificent Daphnis et Chloë which has but a single track for the entire work!). So my point is that trying to have recording organised according to some online authority is doomed to fail at some point.

Now, whilst I entirely understand that some people might want to keep their music organised the same way as the physical item, the future is - whether we like it or not - one of downloads and/or online, and the concept of physical discs is going to fade fast.

So, if it's a choice of one or the other, I'd opt for the flexibility of "Album | Work | Movement" over "Disc | Track" any day (provided there's an automatic method of reassigning otherwise identical track numbers imported from multi-disc "albums").

 

[guardajoias]

The best analogy for a classical music album is probably a concert, which may include several works by one or more composers that an artist will include in the same concert for a specific reason. Take an album such as "Johann Sebastian Bach" by Vikingur Olafsson revolving around music by JS Bach, but in the context of his contemporaries, or Hélène Grimaud's Credo around Arvo Part's Credo but with music by Beethoven and John Corigliano. Look at the Haydn 2032 series... All of those are putting works in context, just like in a concert. I don't want to have to put them back together, but I do want to recognize and play sometimes individually the works contained in those concerts. Other times I will want the concert as intended... But then I do need to see in "Now Playing" what is the work and who is the composer...

 

[guardajoias]

The problem with this is that many of us edit our music, moving tracks around in order to free them from the artificial strictures of traditional "Albums" (recordings) and discs. In fact, this is one of the great benefits of digital storage, allowing us to liberate our music from whatever "original state" the record companies chose (often for marketing purposes).

I happen to own quite a few "duplicate" copies of recordings: generally a newer remastering vs the original recording. Many of these "duplicates" differ in their track assignments, with the reissues having far more tracks than the originals (my classic example is Charles Dutoit's magnificent Daphnis et Chloë which has but a single track for the entire work!). So my point is that trying to have recording organised according to some online authority is doomed to fail at some point.

Now, whilst I entirely understand that some people might want to keep their music organised the same way as the physical item, the future is - whether we like it or not - one of downloads and/or online, and the concept of physical discs is going to fade fast.

So, if it's a choice of one or the other, I'd opt for the flexibility of "Album | Work | Movement" over "Disc | Track" any day (provided there's an automatic method of reassigning otherwise identical track numbers imported from multi-disc "albums").

Discs/concerts/albums and works/movements are not incompatible: just as in a concert, there will be works and their respective movements, so we need both. I also agree though that the metadata from external database are often not satisfactory and therefore ostensibly of us will edit them in a way that suits us. I certainly do before importing any disc, and that is why I also ask for the ability to override Qobuz's metadata which is often wrong or simply has variations in spelling etc that do not work for me. Overriding Qobuz metadata would also allow for Qobuz releases that are in my library to be included in searches on composers or tracks which is currently impossible when added as whole albums.

 

[guardajoias]

It's not out of the question to keep the Disc level in - it's whether the experience would be cleaner and simpler by having them removed, otherwise it can get a bit text/detail heavy. I do know in some cases that actual names are sometimes assigned to individual discs, though this would also be tricky as there is not actually an ID3 tag to technically support this, it would be a level of detail unique/captive to the Sense database. I can see a use-case for this too!

I do not think that names for individual discs in a multi-disc set are necessary... It does not correspond to much...

 

[Stephen Healy]

The best analogy for a classical music album is probably a concert, which may include several works by one or more composers that an artist will include in the same concert for a specific reason. Take an album such as "Johann Sebastian Bach" by Vikingur Olafsson revolving around music by JS Bach, but in the context of his contemporaries, or Hélène Grimaud's Credo around Arvo Part's Credo but with music by Beethoven and John Corigliano. Look at the Haydn 2032 series... All of those are putting works in context, just like in a concert. I don't want to have to put them back together, but I do want to recognize and play sometimes individually the works contained in those concerts. Other times I will want the concert as intended... But then I do need to see in "Now Playing" what is the work and who is the composer...

There would still be an option to 'Play Work' and a general 'Play' for the entire recording/album, I suppose the question is whether it's important to also have a 'Play Disc' level? Because that would be the main reason for dividing the album/recording down to a Disc level, and then to Works and its movements:

 

[Stephen Healy]

The Disc level at times can also be a little bemusing, taking this album as an example:



It does divide into 2 discs...but one of those is over 80 minutes long, so would not have actually fit on a typical CD. Plus its 24/96. So there is no correlation to a CD medium.
Each 'disc' contains 3 works, so that is 6 in total. So is there a benefit to having Disc 1 for Works 1-3, then Disc 2 for works 4-6? As opposed to just one Release with 6 Works in sequence? And let's assume composers can be assigned at a movement/work level, and does not have to be at an overall Recording level.
I'm sure we will reach a conclusion that is nice to have both options for different situations! And that might just have to be the balance we try to strike.

 

[d.c.palmer]

There would still be an option to 'Play Work' and a general 'Play' for the entire recording/album, I suppose the question is whether it's important to also have a 'Play Disc' level? Because that would be the main reason for dividing the album/recording down to a Disc level, and then to Works and its movements:

Hi Stephen, I really don't see any utility in "Play Disc" at all. Definitely useful to "Play Work" and a general "Play" though.